| cheapbag214s |
 Posted: Sat 17:39, 31 Aug 2013 Post subject: parent" |
|
| Indian children from their homes into a statute that required the removal of an Indian child from her home ...The court held that an unwed biological father of Indian lineage who has abandoned a pregnant mother and child may veto the non-Indian mother's lawful decision to place her child for adoption,http://www.ewwealth.com/, even though under state law the father lacked custodial rights and his consent was not required for the adoptive placement. But the state courts disagreed. Regardless of how state law might have resolved the dispute, the judges ruled that the girl would never made it to South Carolina, and into the Capobianco's home,christian louboutin discount, had the couple followed federal law. Brown was a "parent" under the ICWA,Cheap christian louboutin, two state courts ruled, because he was the girl's "biological parent" who had established his federal rights by "acknowledging his paternity ... as soon as he realized" the girl had been put up for adoption. His waiver of his parental rights was invalid,christian louboutin outlet, the South Carolina courts concluded,louboutin sale, because |
|
