www.loltestab.fora.pl
Just a simple test
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Galleries
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
www.loltestab.fora.pl Forum Index
->
Forum testowe
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Jakaś kategoria
----------------
Forum testowe
Topic review
Author
Message
cheapbag214s
Posted: Sat 13:51, 27 Jul 2013
Post subject: as it was about
violate the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court took the Bailey case to settle that disagreement.The justices can be placed on a spectrum in terms of the way they handle Fourth Amendment cases. At one end is Justice Scalia. At the other is Justice Alito.The briefing in the case is top-notch. As you might expect, the parties spend a lot of time arguing over whether the interests that form the basis of Summers justify seizures of departing occupants. The briefing also reveals interesting strategic choices. Bailey pins his hopes on a 2009 decision, Arizona v. Gant,
tory burch outlet
, which addressed whether police can search a car after arresting and handcuffing the driver. In a 5-4 decision, the Court essentially overruled an earlier case and held that such searches were generally impermissible,
fitflops sale
, concluding that the purported justifications -- ensuring police safety and preserving evidence -- simply didn't apply when the arrestee was handcuffed in the back of a squadcar. Gant isn't directly on point as a legal matter, as it was about
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin