www.loltestab.fora.pl
Just a simple test
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Galleries
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
www.loltestab.fora.pl Forum Index
->
Forum testowe
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Jakaś kategoria
----------------
Forum testowe
Topic review
Author
Message
cheapbag214s
Posted: Sat 13:23, 16 Nov 2013
Post subject: which owns 67 of the signs
LA judge sets Monday dealdine to unplug electronic billboards
LOS ANGELES, April 13 () -- A Los Angeles judge ordered two companies to unplug 77 electronic billboards that a rival company said were erected under "an illegal contract" with the city.The signs were first allowed under a 2006 deal between the city of Los Angeles and advertising companies Clear Channel Outdoor, which owns 67 of the signs, and CBS Outdoor.The deal ended a legal challenge to a sign ordinance, with the city agreeing to permit as many as 840 signs to be converted to electronic formats, Los Angeles Times reported Saturday.A smaller company, Summit Media,[url=http://www.christianelouboutinoutlet.com]Christian Louboutin Discount[/url], challenged that arrangement as a sweetheart deal that allowed the larger companies to break the law at the expense of smaller companies.A three-judge panel agreed with Summit in December but the larger companies have kept up legal challenges to the ruling, and are pushing for the city to change its existing sign laws.An attorney for Summit, Timothy Alger, said he appreciated Judge Terry Green's ruling, but also said he was considering taking the case a step further by pursuing legal action to have the signs dismantled."The fact of the matter is, CBS, Clear Channel and the city were all wrongdoers in this thing. They collaborated to enter into an illegal contract," Alger said.The ruling was praised by activists who see billboards as eyesores and complain that the electronic signs are invasive, as they shine into residential neighborhoods."This is what we've been waiting for now for six years. I'm going to be out there personally at 5 o'clock to watch it go dark," said Dennis Hathaway, president of the Coalition to Ban Billboard Blight, referring to the Monday deadline ordered by the court.
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin