www.loltestab.fora.pl

[cheapbag214s]

a given action, you may very well and correctly shorten those phrases to 'wouldn't' or 'couldn't,[url=http://www.noise.it/scarpembtprezzi.html]MBT Scarpe[/url],' or 'shouldn't.' No one gets those wrong, or almost no one.
The Wrong Interpretation The problem with the other end of this trio is under the "coulda/woulda/shoulda" umbrella. Nothing in that example is correct spelling or grammar, but it is understood as slang, or vernacular usage. It is not acceptable in formal writing,[url=http://www.restaurantangle.com/restaurantangle.asp]Oakley Baratas[/url], unless as dialogue spoken by a character in a story.
The problem we see is people mis-understanding, or mis-hearing the contraction for 'could have,' 'would have' or 'should have.' They are correctly contracted and spelled as 'could've,' 'would've,' and 'should've.'
The pronunciation is supposed to keep the 'v' sound from the original "have" in the non-contracted format.
What happens instead,[url=http://www.restaurantangle.com/restaurantangle.asp]Gafas Oakley Baratas[/url], is that people speak it improperly,[url=http://www.staimanmedia.com/staimanmedia.php]knockoff ray bans[/url], so while the "v" sound is kept,[url=http://www.staimanmedia.com/ray-ban.php]Repliaca Ray Ban Wayfarer[/url], an "o" sound gets added (in place of the "ha" from "have") that is replaced with the apostrophe.
The Resulting Error This
相关的主题文章：


[url=http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi]Cheap Fake Oakleys for sale h[/url]

[url=http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi]Cheap Fake Oakleys Wholesale [/url]

[url=http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi]fake ray bans for sale hebing[/url]

[url=http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi]Fake Oakleys Outlets hebing_O[/url]

[url=http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi]Scarpe MBT hebingoakley_3142[/url]