cheapbag214s
Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 17953
Read: 0 topics
Warns: 0/5 Location: England
|
Posted: Sat 15:58, 31 Aug 2013 Post subject: —roughly $50 |
|
|
days,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], we felt we had to pursue every means possible to utilize technology to make sure that calls were accurate without losing the human element of officials on the court,http://www.gamel860.com/," he told ESPN. "While tennis is at a very high level of officiating, there's no denying that through this technology players and fans can know that the right call was given."Not everybody loved the idea, of course. Roger Federer believed the money being spent on correcting "just a few points"—roughly $50,000 per court at the time—could have been better used elsewhere. "I am against the whole idea of replays," the Swiss phenom,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], then 24, declared. True to his word,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Federer would maintain a complicated, begrudging relationship with line-officiating technology for years afterward. But whether Federer and his fellow agnostics liked it or not,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Hawk-Eye and its challenge system were here to stay. In 2008, the four governing bodies of professional tennis (the International Tennis Federation, the WTA, the Association
The post has been approved 0 times
|
|